Expert advice and Hew Strachan

Published by

on

Part of the problem, Strachan contends, is that politicians are unduly worried about allowing military leaders to give frank and open advice. He criticized the way General Stanley McCrystal was forced to resign after making unflattering remarks about his political bosses in Washington. “The concern about the military speaking out shows a lack of democratic and political maturity. We’re not facing the danger of a military coup. The professional experts, who deal with war all the time, should be able to express their views all the time, openly and coherently, just as you would expect a doctor or a teacher to express their views coherently about how you run medical policy or teaching policy,” he said.

Winston Churchill held daily strategy meetings with his chairman of the Chiefs of Staff during the Second World War, which encouraged an open exchange of views. “The Churchill-Allan Brooke relationship was fraught at times but it worked because both were pretty frank with each other,” Strachan said. “Soldiers have a duty here as well—if they just say, ‘yes Mr. Prime Minister or Mr. President, we can give you exactly what you want,’ then they’re probably not being very honest [Daily Beast]

Imagine that Allan Brooke had told a reporter that Churchill didn’t understand what he was doing and that Ismay was stupid!  That’s kind of hard to imagine: Brooke argued fiercely with Churchill, but he never ever attempted to go around him or go public with his criticisms. Nobody can run a war, a government, or even a company if subordinates are openly dismissive and disparaging of their bosses the way McCrystal was. Remember, McCrystal was fired for the contemptuous remarks he and his aides provided to a reporter about the civilian leadership.

Last fall, during the question-and-answer session following a speech he gave in London, McChrystal dismissed the counterterrorism strategy being advocated by Vice President Joe Biden as “shortsighted,” saying it would lead to a state of “Chaos-istan.” The remarks earned him a smackdown from the president himself, who summoned the general to a terse private meeting aboard Air Force One. The message to McChrystal seemed clear: Shut the fuck up, and keep a lower profile.

Now, flipping through printout cards of his speech in Paris, McChrystal wonders aloud what Biden question he might get today, and how he should respond. “I never know what’s going to pop out until I’m up there, that’s the problem,” he says. Then, unable to help themselves, he and his staff imagine the general dismissing the vice president with a good one-liner. 

“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?”

“Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say: Bite Me?”

So after a strong warning from the President, McCrystal and his aides talk in grossly disrespectful and childish way in front of a reporter from Rolling Stone! And this is the kind of shop McCrystal was operating:

“I’d rather have my ass kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner,” McChrystal says.

He pauses a beat.

“Unfortunately,” he adds, “no one in this room could do it.”

With that, he’s out the door.

“Who’s he going to dinner with?” I ask one of his aides. 

“Some French minister,” the aide tells me. “It’s fucking gay.”

A McDonalds store manager exhibiting that level of bratty, undisciplined behavior and poor supervision of staff would be fired on the spot. How could such a high profile General be allowed to act this way? That McCrystal was so privileged, so arrogant, and so clueless that he permitted this to happen in front of a reporter tells you something very disturbing about the upper ranks of the US officer corps (not something that would surprise anyone who has read Hackworth, for example).  This was in no way a case of a General not being permitted to openly advocate or give advice to his chain of command – it was a case of gross insubordination and lack of discipline that was impossible to tolerate. But surely Strachan knows this story. Alan Brooke would have undoubtedly personally executed a General who acted like McCrystal.  So one has to ask: what is Strachan’s purpose? Why does he need such a misleading characterization of such a well documented event?

Leave a comment