The bureaucracy of the US Government: DOD Example

Published by

on

 

Report: Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction
This quarter, I must once again reiterate my concerns about the policies of the U.S. Army’s suspension and debarment program. As I have pointed out in our last six quarterly reports, the Army’s refusal to suspend or debar supporters of the insurgency from receiving government contracts because the information supporting these recommendations is classified is not only legally wrong, but contrary to sound policy and national security goals. I remain troubled by the fact that our government can and does use classified information to arrest, detain, and even kill individuals linked to the insurgency in Afghanistan, but apparently refuses to use the same classified information to deny those same individuals their right to obtain contracts with the U.S. government. There is no logic to this continuing disparity. I continue to urge the Secretary of Defense and Congress to change this misguided policy and to impose common sense on the Army’s suspension and debarment program.
Via Antiwar.com because our worthless so-called Free-Press is not interested in this when they are so busy getting all dizzy with Chris Christie’s tough guy act and covering for child killers in the St. Louis police force.

Leave a comment